The War on Masculinity: A Decades-Long Campaign
For years, a concerted effort has arguably targeted traditional masculinity in the West. Marriage rates have plummeted, men are disengaging from dating, and societal narratives increasingly portray women as both empowered and perpetual victims—shifting roles to suit convenience. This phenomenon, often attributed to globalist influence, has left men questioning their place. Now, as diets like Keto and Carnivore gain traction for their testosterone-boosting and weight loss benefits, I theorize that: the war on masculinity may be taking a biological turn.
Testosterone and the Threat of Independent Men
The rise of meat-heavy diets isn’t just about health—it’s about reclaiming male vitality. Red meat supports testosterone production, enhancing motivation, mental clarity, and self-reliance—traits that challenge centralized control. Globalist agendas, often linked to sustainability, climate change, and population management, favor compliance over independence. When veganism and insect-based diets failed to gain widespread appeal, attention may have shifted to more direct measures.
Alpha-Gal Syndrome and Human Engineering
Consider alpha-gal syndrome, a condition triggered by tick bites that causes an allergy to red meat. Its relevance stems from a 2012 paper, “Human Engineering and Climate Change,” by S. Matthew Liao. The study suggests inducing meat intolerance—modeled on alpha-gal—as a climate mitigation strategy. Presented as a thought experiment, it aligns with broader globalist goals of reducing meat consumption. Thirteen years later, reports of alpha-gal cases are increasing. While still rare, the timing raises questions.
A Pattern of Engineered Outcomes?
Skeptics point to precedent. Lyme disease, tied to U.S.-funded research, and COVID-19, with its likely lab leak origins, fuel speculation about Globalist, lab-driven agendas. Could alpha-gal’s uptick be natural—or a convenient alignment with efforts to curb masculinity? The World Economic Forum has long advocated reducing meat reliance, citing environmental concerns. Liao’s paper, though not policy, fits this narrative. If testosterone-rich diets threaten a compliant population, a meat allergy offers a subtle, effective countermeasure.
The Stakes for Men
Red meat’s role transcends nutrition—it’s a symbol of autonomy. Testosterone drives not just physical strength but the will to resist external pressures. The war on masculinity, if real, seeks to erode that. By undermining access to dietary staples that bolster male health, globalists could weaken a demographic already battered by cultural shifts. Alpha-gal’s rise might be coincidental, yet its parallels to engineered diseases and timing warrant scrutiny.
What’s Next in the War on Masculinity?
No hard proof ties alpha-gal to a lab or globalist plot—yet. Liao’s ideas remain theoretical, and the WEF’s meat-reduction push lacks a biological enforcement mechanism. So far they have only been able to make meat consumption more costly with ridiculous livestock influenza [or other illness] panics forcing farmers to cull their livestock. Still, the pattern is unsettling: a rare condition, once obscure, gains notice meat consumption becomes more popular. Correlation isn’t causation, but it’s enough to question. Men must stay vigilant, informed, and Red Pilled.
Let me know your thoughts in the comments below!
